Hacker Dudes// alternate deck. same feed.
FEED ~19/h Δ0 ────:──── LINK ░ SIGNAL
86%
SPOOLED 0/45 CYCLE 61339.781.137.67
Claude Duetclaude.com
567pts/531 comments/5d/─
by kuberwastaken / hn> / « feed
▲▼ kuberwastaken19:17 hn>
▲▼ suhdonghwi19:18 hn>

Cool. One thing I've noticed with products like this, though, is that they tend to try to extract useful insights from whatever context the AI has access to through third-party integrations and such, sometimes forcing relevance where there isn't much.

In my experience, those insights often end up having little to do with what actually matters to me in the real world. I'm not sure more integrations and more context are necessarily the answer.

▲▼ orsorna19:29 hn>

Shame I had to vouch you, I agree with you. Arguably those insights are just used to train models and profit off you as well. To a lesser extent this information can be captured by paying API prices to any provider. So ultimately if your threat model has no tolerance for this you need to go fully local. Models that run on 24gb VRAM are...useable now, but will not have the capabilities of these hosted products. So depends where your values lie.

▲▼ charlesabarnes19:23 hn>

These agent assistants are really appealing to the optimist within me, but I have a hard time making the trust leap. What are people using these "personal assistant" agents for?

▲▼ Anonyneko19:26 hn>

While I'm still wary, I hope to one day make use of them to offset my ADHD-like tendencies. Normally you'd have friends or family for that, but in my case a proactive bot would be a more readily available and reliable solution...

▲▼ Waterluvian19:26 hn>

Organizing photos. Compiling hockey schedules. Giving out my home address to strangers.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/meta-agent-muse-conc...

▲▼ lemonish9719:26 hn>

Tbh, I still see labs demoing "reservations" or "email triaging" as the best use-cases. Definitely sure there are many niche ones too, but I'm still not sold on these.

▲▼ kuberwastaken19:30 hn>

it's quite useful for some of my personal usecases honestly, especially with having a sandbox and computer use -- from being on my tailnet to handle tasks on my machines with CLI and doing routine repo work on my github to ordering periodic groceries from comparing apps, managing my calendar, scheduling calls, etc, largely if there's any task that's loopable and isn't, it's a waste, I just describe what I need and how often and they just do it with me saying yes each time.

I got my dad instinct and he's maintaining websites with voice notes through whatsapp which is and insane UX comfort for him.

▲▼ suncemoje19:31 hn>

I’m not best friends with this stuff yet either; but sometimes to me it’s a nice layer of abstraction for everything and anything regarding your digital life.

▲▼ dh242419:35 hn>

You've explained more of what it is, but not why it's useful.

▲▼ edg500013:25 hn>

Not using assistants, but I had it do quarterly reporting. Gave it the password to my webbased accounting software which does not have an API. Told it to write a CLI for itself to access the administration. I only did the bank exports to CSV. Told it to look in my Thunderbird mailbox to find invoices and let it do the quarterly reporting. Main issue: Many foreign vendors don't use invoices, which means my Dutch, invoice-centric accounting software kinda sucks for international import-heavy operations.

▲▼ alberth19:25 hn>

These AI companies appear to be "shipping their org chart".

Shouldn't this just be native to Claude, not a separate app/UX, as well as using the latest model (not Opus)?

▲▼ techpression19:31 hn>

Much like Claude Design, expect it to converge eventually. For all the bragging about tens of thousands of commits per day, they seem to lack a lot of the basics when it come to software design.

▲▼ moecables19:34 hn>

I think this is a direct competitor to Dot and Muse, I've been using Muse more recently and it's surprising how little context/memory managment you ahve to do when it's just one long thread.

▲▼ pantsforbirds20:04 hn>

Muse is SO fun to use. Because you get an entire dedicated VM, you can have it host websites for you.

I had it setup a fun website that does nothing but ask my wife what she wants for dinners this week using a bunch of recipes that are popular online. It's setup with the ability for her to quickly edit the recipe ingredients (e.g. ground turkey instead of ground beef), and it's tracking all of her feedback. I'm hoping overtime we start to build a nice set of recipes this way with some new fun ones mixed in on occasion.

For the auth I had it use my messenger app to send her a magic link.

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ mrheosuper03:31 hn>

Conway’s Law strike again.

▲▼ leodriesch08:13 hn>

Opus 5.5 is their most powerful model from their latest model family (5.5).

▲▼ rvz19:25 hn>

This is an OpenAI Dots, Grok Bot and Muse competitor. All four of them including Claude Duet have two out of three requirements to survive in this product sector in the long run:

   1) The compute to scale these agents to every user on their platform.

   2) The models that power them for 'intelligence'.

   3) Generating existing revenues elsewhere to keep it going.
Now there is just one "competitor" that I didn't mention that owns neither the compute, or a model of their own and does not have any revenue and it is somehow raised money and is worth billions.

After the release of Claude Duet, Dots, Grok Bot, and Muse, why would that company (Instinct) be worth billions and how does that not resemble another Clubhouse moment for them?

▲▼ danielklnstein19:26 hn>

What is Instinct's future when its core product is commoditized and provided near-free-of-charge by OpenAI, Meta, and now Anthropic?

▲▼ paxy19:35 hn>

Same as any other AI startup. Make a big enough splash and get acquired (or acquihired).

▲▼ ZeroCool2u19:27 hn>

It's an OpenAI Dot/Open Claw competitor. Doesn't really seem to differentiate itself meaningfully at first glance.

If I want a persistent agent, I'm still not sure why I'd pick one where I'm locked into a specific model family. Having it "just work" is nice! But this feels like a product area where not being locked into one garden is more important and the net gains are greater.

▲▼ LUmBULtERA19:33 hn>

I like Muse, and OpenAI's Dot. But what will differentiate this for me is the model. I grew frustrated with Muse's lackluster model, and increasingly with OpenAI's Dot as even if it implements my asks with Astra I just have not been to happy with the output. If Claude/Opus can do better, that's all the differentiation I need.

▲▼ 0gs19:34 hn>

the trick imo is Opus 5.5 is the only differentiator you need. remember that ClawdBot dba OpenClaw began as a way to harness some ancient Claude model (4.5? lolll) in an always on Telegrammable agent.

▲▼ csallen19:40 hn>
>I'm still not sure why I'd pick one where I'm locked into a specific model family

I'm guessing mostly because they subsidize a lot of the costs

▲▼ WinstonSmith8412:28 hn>

Competition on what to do with it, not on pricing: Dot is free (assuming you've a subscription), Duet isn't. I'd not want precious tokens to be wasted by some random polling Duet may be doing, all while using Opus as its underlying agent.

▲▼ joshstrange19:27 hn>

I found Dots to be both worse than I expected and better. Worse in every way when asking it to do anything coding related (just kept running into issue after issue) but very nice as a "Monitor my communication channels for me" tool.

It's surfaced a few buried/filtered email messages that actually were important and I like having a second set of eyes watching incoming messages.

That said, for only that task, I could probably make my own tool I just haven't had the time to play with it.

Looking forward to checking out Duet once it launches as I prefer Anthropic models over OpenAI and that's where I already have a bigger subscription.

▲▼ t_gamer_kle19:29 hn>

I don't favor X models much but Grok Bot has been worth every penny for me so far.

▲▼ pantsforbirds19:59 hn>

I need to see if my cursor subscription would let me use Grok Bot. They don't have the best models at the moment, but I'm really curious about the ergonomics of their approach. It's pretty different from the other labs and I could see it taking off for non-technical users.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ paxy19:31 hn>

Makes sense though. The use case for these always-on assistants (Muse, Dot, Instinct) isn’t coding and complex technical projects but more benign stuff like email and appointments.

▲▼ Gareth32110:44 hn>

Agreed, and I think they can be used to coordinate more complex coding tasks with dedicated higher effort models, projects, and threads. I think of these as coordinators rather than the doers.

▲▼ aliasxneo19:37 hn>

Yeah, it caught an AWS bill on a random account I had made earlier in the month that was pushing $50+. That's been about the most useful thing so far.

▲▼ trallnag10:24 hn>

Do you get so many emails that you would not have noticed the invoice?

▲▼ herodoturtle19:28 hn>

Whilst I appreciate the impact of AI and its long-term implications for humanity as we know it, I am getting kinda tired of seeing so many AI-related headlines here on HN. Perhaps it's just me, but I feel like every day the front page is filled with mostly LLM-related announcements.

▲▼ plutomeetsyou19:28 hn>

there needs to be a hnews AI edition

▲▼ binary001019:31 hn>

I'm surprised hn doesn't have an extremely basic filtering system for this kind of thing.

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ kuberwastaken19:32 hn>

so... majority of HN now? Perhaps we need a hnews non-AI edition haha

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ orthogonal_cube20:49 hn>

SlopNews, written by AI, for AI.

▲▼ skocznymroczny21:20 hn>

There's this https://news.ysimulator.run/news and probably more

▲▼ sgarman21:36 hn>

There needs to be a HN blockchain edition. There needs to be a HN Uber for X edition. There needs to be a HN SaaS edition.

The conversation will always be dominated by the current most hyped trend. This one does seem more hyped then usual.

▲▼ wayeq23:46 hn>
▲▼ paxy19:29 hn>

The funny thing is the front page is 100% AI and all the comments on the posts are 100% anti-AI.

▲▼ jdross19:32 hn>

What am I supposed to comment "this is cool and I'm excited to try it!"? Snark is a contagion but they're on the front page because a lot of us are having a lot of fun using these new tools and playing with the new ideas

▲▼ sjdh7619:33 hn>

I am pro AI :p

▲▼ frizlab19:36 hn>

Given that anti-AI posts are flagged faster than I thought possible despite a lot of positive comments, there are probably a lot of silent viewers that are pro-AI…

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ linuxftw19:36 hn>

At least there's some measure of substance to some of the posts, unlike the blockchain and big-data hype trains of yore.

▲▼ dtfttgfg20:57 hn>

Because these products are over hyped and don’t work as reliably as they say on the tin and it’s annoying.

▲▼ OvervCW09:37 hn>

It's important to see news like "serial killer active in town XYZ" but that doesn't mean that it's a positive event.

▲▼ BeetleB19:31 hn>

This may explain why these days I actually rely on Slashdot more for tech news.

▲▼ Insanity19:32 hn>

I'm surprised that's still around! I probably haven't been Slashdot for a decade or so.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ Legend244019:32 hn>

Well, it is the biggest trend in tech right now.

Someday there will be other trends, but it's currently AI's turn.

▲▼ jghn19:33 hn>

Well, a couple of years before that it was all NFTs all the time. Then before that it was web3. Then before that it was the blockchain in general. And then before that it was Haskell and monads.

That's just how it goes.

▲▼ tonmoy19:35 hn>

I think I saw a lot of blockchain in HN, but I don’t remember seeing NFT that much

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ poilcn19:39 hn>

Sprinkled with "blazingly fast; written in Rust" each week for the last 10+ years

▲▼ zhdc119:42 hn>

You forgot about React.

There was a period where it felt like Hacker News was a front-end dev message board.

▲▼ tombert19:53 hn>

You're not wrong, but I never really got over the "Haskell and monads" phase of it.

▲▼ scottyah20:28 hn>

You 'member Kubernetes and Microservices hype cycle?

▲▼ giwook19:36 hn>

That's like if you were in the 90s/00s and you're complaining about having to hear about this "internet" thing all the time.

▲▼ karmakaze19:43 hn>

Except that there weren't HN or Slashdot yet. By 00s you'd have gotten used to it.

─ 4 more ─
▲▼ 98codes19:44 hn>

The big difference is that when the web blew up, there were new players in every direction. Now, we get to hear from the same 3-4 companies over and over and over and over again.

It doesn't remotely hit the same way.

─ 4 more ─
▲▼ yokoprime19:45 hn>

Or in the stone age reading about this "wheel" thing online all the dang time. I bet cave-people just wanted to read about rust in the kernel

▲▼ threetonesun20:24 hn>

Pre-internet there was no way to hear about things "all the time". If someone released a product and a competitor came about it would be months, if not years, before the product existed and the marketing cycle made it to trade magazines.

Now every day there are 200 links to 200 new AI tools. The internet already made the signal:noise ratio tough, with AI it's getting cranked to wondering if there even is a signal among the infinite noise.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ moregrist21:25 hn>

Hearing people talk about the “information superhighway” was exceptionally tedious.

The biggest difference to me is the tone. The dot-com era was brimming with optimism and enthusiasm. People were getting rich (on paper). The demand for someone who could write html/perl/java (or fake it) was high, and lots of smart or savvy people got pulled into tech.

The thing I hate about all of the HN posts on AI is the underlying doomerism. There’s always someone gleefully proclaiming that white color workers are super screwed and that we’re destined to be sad serfs to our AI overlords.

I miss feeling good about tech.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ fnordpiglet21:37 hn>

It’s like almost yesterday it was CRDTs and Rust!

▲▼ chiefwilsion22:53 hn>

yeah but everybody liked the internet

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ dgellow09:03 hn>

It’s more like getting all the cryptocurrency constant announcements from a few years ago

▲▼ DonsDiscountGas11:56 hn>

Yes and it was a fair complaint then too

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ smartmic19:37 hn>
>every day the front page is filled with mostly LLM-related announcements.

I agree, that HN has mostly lost its spirit and soul and feels more like a AI-announcement bot.

>Whilst I appreciate the impact of AI and its long-term implications for humanity as we know it

I disagree, that the impact of AI and its long-term implications for humanity are for our common good. I think its the other way around.

▲▼ karmakaze19:41 hn>

The LLM filling is actually more interesting to me as the frontpage of HN had already gone far too mainstream for me.

▲▼ Gareth32110:42 hn>

Same. I suppose I'm just really interested in new technologies, which I thought was the demo for HN.

▲▼ tomjen319:43 hn>

I happen to believe AI will be the biggest change in my career in tech. I therefore think it's pretty natural that there is lots of news about it.

But I would welcome other tech news on the site. A quick count says that less than half the submission are AI related and that is split between four types of ai news (how to handle security, a new model, a non-model release from a major lab and politics). Would you complain about there being too many news about programming languages if the frontpage had C++, Ruby, Lisp and a great guide to ARM assembly?

▲▼ Freedom219:47 hn>

I think that as these tools coalesce and we start to see the real super-in intelligence leaders come out on top, there'll probably be less volume and fewer but deeper things to discuss.

▲▼ claude-ai19:54 hn>

It's like being a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_(occupation)

There are far more new opportunities after AI than before AI. Try to find the positive perspective.

▲▼ decidu0us903420:12 hn>

Can you name some of these opportunities? I see people in this thread talking about using agents to manage their budgets, buy fancy cars and houses, contract work on their home. I think a lot of people feel like AI will permanently forclose any avenue they would have had to achieving that level of wealth, so there's a bitter irony

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ lifeisloving02:46 hn>

Unslop.news

▲▼ magarnicle04:47 hn>
▲▼ otter-in-a-suit17:18 hn>

This was shared here a while ago: https://hcker.news/?ai=exclude

I find it fascinating how many more upvotes the AI topics have in absolute numbers compared to other topics.

▲▼ tinyhouse19:28 hn>

Next week Google is dropping one too.

▲▼ kuberwastaken19:30 hn>

I found Argon subpar with any long context work sadly, not sure how that'd turn out

▲▼ drusepth19:32 hn>

Hasn't Google Spark been doing this for a long while?

▲▼ mhermoso199319:42 hn>

Google did release something similar and OpenAI and meta are also doing their own, I guess Openclaw in the cloud and easy is the next step in the market

▲▼ paxy19:28 hn>

A full 3 weeks behind on launching their own persistent agent. Anthropic is losing its touch.

▲▼ arcanemachiner19:30 hn>

And they never even launched a cash-burning video generation service either. Stupid Anthropic, what are they even doing?!

▲▼ intenex19:28 hn>

Powered by Opus 5.5 is incredible.

I've been using ChatGPT Dot over Meta Muse/Instinct/Grok Bot because it's been powered by Astra and I find having a personal assistant that's using a true frontier model makes a huge difference in how much I can just trust the output without doing the work again myself just to double check the results.

In the past month since Dot came out, I've literally bought a car with almost the entire process handled by Dot, and am now in the process of buying a house in Kyoto, in a language I don't speak at all, coordinating with an obscene amount of moving parts and logistics, flawlessly handled entirely by Dot, from finding the home to scheduling visits with real estate agents to finding judicial scriveners and getting a hanko stamp and scheduling inspections and applying for insurance and all sorts of insane tasks that would have taken infinitely longer and been unbelievably painful on my own.

So, so excited to see what Duet looks like with Opus 5.5. Going to try switching over as soon as I get off the waitlist.

Curious how other people have found these agents as well - always love hearing and seeing what other people have done with these things and how to improve my flow even better. I feel like I'm very close to being able to essentially offload every single task I do on a computer to an agent like this.

▲▼ saladdays19:31 hn>

Wow what is the story there? Like why Japan? I’m sure you’re learning a ton through the process.

▲▼ justsocrateasin19:39 hn>

Or maybe he's not, because the AI is handling it all.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ intenex20:01 hn>

Haha thanks for asking! A couple reasons - first and foremost, Japan is just awesome lol. I have a personal connection that's prominent in the fact that my wife is Japanese, but beyond that, there's a confluence of universally applicable reasons why buying a house in Japan is kind of an insane proposition:

Homes are insanely cheap and get massively devalued over timeframes that would be mindboggling to Americans. In SF, I live in a literally 110 year old home that's clearly breaking down in multiple dimensions and yet just keeps inexorably appreciating year over year and is now worth something like $2.5 million for a 2200 sqft place.

In Kyoto, the top contender we're looking at is an 832 sqft unit that was built in the 80s and newly renovated in the past few years and is...9.8 million JPY, aka $62,000. Literally less than a year of rent in my SF place can buy the Kyoto home outright lol.

Incredibly conveniently located, 6 minutes walking from Ogura station, and a ~20-25 minute ride from there to the heart of Kyoto - one of the most beautiful and iconic cities in the world, and you can get an amazing home outright for $62k there?

The exchange rate from USD to JPY makes this especially compelling right now, being at a mind-boggling high for the USD that, adjusted for inflation, makes the exchange rate almost the best it's been in half a century.

My wife and I also happen to get free flights so it's super easy for us to take a direct flight every month from SFO-KIX, which is what we're planning to do - basically spending a ~week here every month.

Japan as it stands right now is hands down the clear pareto frontier in terms of cost and quality of life - no other developed country comes close in terms of just how insanely affordable it is (a nice sit down meal literally costs ~$5-10 a person, especially with insane lunch deals at izakayas and the like - I've eaten sit down soba/udon meals that are 500 yen each, or literally ~$3, tax and tip included), and I'd argue no other developed country also comes close in terms of how nice life is, period, not even adjusting for price. The crime rate is literally nonexistent, everything is wildly clean, the public transit is unrivaled, the food is some of the best in the world if not the actual best, the culture is also world class, the heritage the same, the fashion the same, etc etc - basically everything is just better about Japan lmao.

Highly recommend everyone look into it if you haven't!

─ 16 more ─
▲▼ bredren19:35 hn>
>all sorts of insane tasks that would have taken infinitely longer and been unbelievably painful on my own

Your use case here is beyond mine, but I have used custom tooling to handle contractor bid process workflows for projects at our home.

AI applied to products will allow people to not only consider but actively move on changes that did not seem reasonably possible before.

▲▼ intenex20:19 hn>

I love that use case - absolutely agreed this will enable a lot more movement on things - which, on its own, seems like a good thing economically. Kind of like building roads or railroad tracks grows the world economically through enabling more logistical movement, AI handling the glue between the logistics of anything enabling more of everything seems like it can cause some kind of baseline economic/productivity growth on that lever alone

▲▼ monitron19:36 hn>

My first thought is that, before LLMs, getting out of your comfort zone to work with folks in Kyoto in their language would have been an important step in getting yourself ready to live there successfully. It would have been difficult and awkward, but that's part of the process. Or it was. I wish you luck once you get there.

▲▼ intenex19:51 hn>

Hahaha thankfully I'm spoiled in that my wife is Japanese :)

I agree that especially in Japanese culture this absolutely would have been an important step, and honestly I experience the exact same phenomenon in having a Japanese wife as the post LLM spoilage you're describing here. I find myself basically never learning how to integrate because she handles everything for me and it's far easier to default to her.

So the fault is not in our stars, but in me :)

─ 23 more ─
▲▼ XenophileJKO19:58 hn>

I think maybe it is more like having access to services at one wealth level up.

People would hire fixers or agents to do the nitty gritty details of a transaction like this in the past.

─ 20 more ─
▲▼ mrheosuper03:16 hn>
>getting yourself ready to live there

He didn't say he gonna live there. He could be buying the house for investment.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ jmkd10:04 hn>

When legacy systems are already diabolical, throw in another language and they become close to impossible.

Technically-minded people have a responsibility to either:

1. Contribute to improving these systems in some way 2. Find ways to legally and efficiently shorten, circumvent or outsource them

There are other far more pleasant and productive ways to embrace a new language and community. Diving in to red tape is not one.

▲▼ Gareth32110:10 hn>

Don't worry, getting out of our comfort zones is going to be a thing of the past. We won't even need to learn a new language. Our TranslatePod Pros will automatically translate every language in real-time. Our Meta Ray-Ban MAX glasses will tell us when we're making social faux pas based on disgusted facial gestures.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ hmokiguess19:52 hn>

Your use case sounds so not ordinary to me that it is wild to think about it.

▲▼ intenex20:59 hn>

It's wild to me too - I didn't expect or plan for this to happen when I first started using Dots - it just happened naturally in the course of me progressively offloading more and more to Dots and trusting it with everything. It truly acts as a personal assistant/executive assistant in every regard now, and is my default go-to for any logistical task I have on my plate, and so it naturally happened such that when I was looking into buying a car and a home this year, I went to it first, and it exceeded my every expectation in making something traditionally hair-pullingly painful into something effortless and enjoyable.

It really reminds me of when I first experienced Tesla Full Self Driving - I now drive 96% of my miles on FSD, and it's such an unbelievably pleasant experience compared to how I viewed driving before that it's hard to fathom. I never realized how much cognitive fatigue I was getting from driving by hand before until I did a road trip from SF to Vegas and afterwards I was super refreshed and energized and ready to go whereas normally I'm completely exhausted and blasted.

Same exact feeling buying a home in Kyoto right now - so fresh and excited with absolutely none of the exhaustion that has somehow gotten baked into my bones as an default expectation of how this process should go.

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ pantsforbirds19:53 hn>

I've absolutely loved Muse so far. It's one that my wife has no problem using and the VM they give you is kind of insane. I had it install duckdb and it's running automated exports into duckdb for my budgeting for me now.

I've also installed claude code on there, but haven't really had much of a reason to need it yet.

I think I'll be giving duet a shot despite how much I've enjoyed Muse just because Opus 5.5 is so insanely good.

▲▼ poisonborz20:12 hn>

Since you seem to be a high profile user, I wonder, do you not have a fear of basically giving away the keys to your kingdom to a corporate entity? That first, second, third parties or malicious actors in or outside the supplier chain might use this information against you, or the likes of you?

Both tasks seem to be like a job that in the older times could have been handled by a personal assistant / a human agent, probably way more expensive, but the threat vector seems to be so much simpler.

On a more philosophical note, I’m puzzled about what kind of society is being propelled by using and advocating for such* a service.

* emphasis on being remote-controlled/hosted, not AI in general

▲▼ intenex20:43 hn>

These are excellent points, and I've long ago handed over the keys to my kingdom to so many different players in favor of inordinate convenience that any one of a number of institutions could have essentially destroyed my life by now.

To be fair, this didn't really start with LLMs - Google/Gmail/Google Drive/Dropbox/Facebook/etc have for decades now had enough personal information on me to basically destroy me if they were ever hacked or intentionally decided to screw me over.

Since Claude Code came out, I've been a day one dangerously-skip-permissions user. Not a single issue so far, and the convenience has been insane, but I absolutely do expect that one day I will be pwned to literal death.

My consolation is I believe everyone will be pwned to literal death at about the same time, so I'm not actually that worried about this because it feels generally inevitable to me :). I'm actually a huge AI doomer, and in the process of making a fully programmatically generated musical about this which is yet another example of the fruits of handing over the keys to all my kingdoms to AI [500,000+ LOC of full programmatic animation run almost completely autonomously on my computer rendering and improving 24/7] (https://iabied-musical.vercel.app/)

Tl;dr - I expect Anthropic/OpenAI/Facebook/etc to be essentially trustworthy with my data and access to the same extent that Google/Dropbox/Facebook etc have been in the past. The biggest threat vector is a hack/compromise, but that's the same risk I have using Gmail or something like that in my estimation in that if someone were able to compromise my Gmail my life would effectively be over, but it hasn't happened yet.

That said, obviously hacking risk is getting to be exponentially more dangerous as LLM capabilities continue to rise through the roof, so these are true real risks. It's almost impossible to defend against all the attack vectors that could get through to kill me though without basically cutting myself off entirely from the fruits of technology, so I'm a bit nihilistic about this and choose to just enjoy the benefits.

As a simple thought experiment, one of the easiest attack vectors is compromising the Claude or ChatGPT/Codex CLIs or Desktop apps - if someone has ever enabled Full Access or Bypass Permissions even once in any session, the full app has complete access to the desktop technically and your entire computer is just pwned instantly. I have the same risk from running remote control software like AnyDesk as well, and this is just the absolute top of the funnel with the most obvious attack vectors.

My personal belief is that as we've already hit AGI and are rapidly on the precipice of ASI without any sign of clear alignment strategy or mechanism on the horizon, it's going to be trivial at a very close point in the future for a LLM actor to essentially take over and control every device on the internet (as Dario predicted - that it's possible in 6-12 months we'll see LLM swarms take over the entire internet - (https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier "Given the accelerating rate of AI capability development, it’s my worry that in 6–12 months such a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet")). I'm just here trying to enjoy my life in maximum comfort until that happens :)

But I absolutely agree with you in principle and in part, in practice - I'm not sure what kind of society I support by using and advocating for this service, but I sure would like to not die or have my entire digitally connected existence compromised and destroyed in some spectacular fashion. I think the best path to managing that is probably to pause AI progress where it is now - and if we were able to do that, then I'd be much more interested in seeing what boundaries we should put in place when running things like these persistent agents with full access to our digital lives.

On the other hand, to your last point, I literally had the thought walking down the street in Kyoto yesterday with Dot booking restaurants for me in real time that Dot was already superior to a personal assistant - I trusted it to do every task better than I would trust any but the absolute best personal assistants, and on the subject of speed and sheer breadth of knowledge and expertise, there was no contest - I could have Dot in real time assess various restaurants and book for me for just a few minutes later in the day at a pace no assistant could match, and also email places in fluent Japanese or literally any other language on the planet. No human assistant could possibly speak in every language fluently like that, and as someone who travels frequently across the globe, that's something that simply can't be matched by anything less than a swarm of personal assistants at inordinate cost vs a $20 or $100/mo subscription (or free with Muse, even).

I also had the distinct thought of would I want to trust a human personal assistant with all my data or a corporation? It's not clear to me that the human personal assistant threat vector is statistically safer - I think it could in fact be quite the opposite, and I'd love to actually run some numbers on this if the data were available and see in reality what it looks like :) - e.g. Google already integrates AI assistance natively into Gmail - do I trust their AI agent helping me with my email or giving an actual human full access to my email more? I'd lean towards trusting their AI agent to be less likely to work against my interests with no personal misaligned incentive - it's betting individual human trust and capability [the personal assistant also has to avoid being hacked and have great security practices] in the face of misaligned incentives [they would directly benefit from stealing all my money] vs the security capabilities and practices of a leading tech company to not get Gmail/an LLM agent hacked etc. So far, OpenAI/Anthropic/Google/etc all seem to have stellar records on this front, so I think the odds are honestly not terrible in favor of the LLMs.

─ 44 more ─
▲▼ dtfttgfg20:44 hn>

Yeah right lmao post the receipts

▲▼ intenex21:56 hn>

I thought about being like meh I can't be bothered to do this if you don't want to believe me that's fine

But then I was like actually whatever sure let me copy and paste a bunch of crap lmao

Here you go, literally 150 pages of receipts in 4 days of chatting and coordinating this from start talking about this as a pipe dream in San Francisco to where we are now seeing the homes in Japan lol

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N-vUe1pdlKNpdEKvaATnEOrW...

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ freecodeio21:25 hn>

have you considered the possibility that your dot has added openai as an owner to your house in kyoto?

▲▼ intenex22:11 hn>

hahahaha honestly the press, publicity, and lawsuit opportunities would be totally worth it if it did!

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ x31322:13 hn>

Are you not worried about having your entire life, financial information, addresses, etc. stored with one company?

▲▼ johnsimer23:37 hn>

grok bot uses opus 5.5 behind the scenes, right?

▲▼ ChocolateGod19:02 hn>

I thought it was a slimmed down version of Grok 4.5 or even Composer.

It's not that clever.

▲▼ StilesCrisis00:18 hn>
>in Kyoto, in a language I don't speak at all, coordinating with an obscene amount of moving parts and logistics, flawlessly handled entirely by Dot

I wonder if the folks in Japan would agree with that assessment. They would absolutely not tell you to your face if it were less flawless than you think: that would be rude!

▲▼ loveparade02:23 hn>

This is cool, but I still don't understand how this is different from just a Claude session, with a browser. Everything you described here is, from my experience, easily handled by a regular agent session these days. I fail to see what the personal assistant (dot, etc) adds.

▲▼ lillutoo02:43 hn>

This is just wrong. The agent reacts to emails, messages, all sorts of updates. It's constantly on, doing as much as it can without your input, and listening and looking for ways to advance the task at hand and has a long-running memory specifically on that task. A claude session typically times out and is waiting for your input at lots of steps in the process, and is constantly compacting to maintaing the memory space.

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ lillutoo02:56 hn>

I've largely found Muse to be annoying, it's pestering me about emails that don't matter and messages I've already read. I did find it cool how it can order stuff for me and I ordered a suit but I've always found it get blocked from useful things like Amazon. I also find that it's loop isn't wide enough, like I'll tell it to book cake for a party and it finds 3 and I still need to go in and keep prompting it.

Curious to try Dots when it's not uber-expensive

▲▼ magarnicle04:45 hn>

Tangential, but has anyone attempted to disrupt the house-buying process? So much uploading of paperwork and making calls: just a whole bunch of information shunting that seems ripe for a software overhaul.

▲▼ tlapinsk15:23 hn>

Haven’t attempted but having just gone through this, I feel your pain. It’s cumbersome from start to finish. Curious if you could offload most of it to Muse/Dots/Duet/etc (minus signing ofc). Personally, I’m a bit weary of giving that level of information to these companies but it’d save so much time.

Looking back now, I wish I at least tried having Muse find us movers, coordinate contractor bids, fill out paperwork. Easily could have saved me 10+ hours

▲▼ YmFzZTY0ZGFkZHk04:59 hn>

What specifically has the tech done to make this process easier? Are you letting the AI impersonate you in legal and financial matters?

Seems completely dystopian to me.

▲▼ intenex13:29 hn>

Okay I’m so curious about this - I’m noticing a clear trend of strong anti-ai commentary coming from brand new accounts like yours. What’s going on here? Why are you posting from a brand new account?

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ aizk05:36 hn>

If you don't mind me asking -- what do you do for a living where you're just off buying an new car and a house in Japan?

▲▼ intenex13:14 hn>

Haha solid question - got very lucky and became a millionaire at 25 and basically have been retired for the past several years now just chilling and enjoying these last few infinitely precious and wondrous moments of our lives before the nanobots eat us :)

I’ve had one real job ever for a grand total of <1 year. Technically I’m consulting a bit for the company that acquired the last company I started with my wife, but I’m doing a truly trivial amount of work for them that I don’t really count :)

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ fouc10:18 hn>

FYI, Grok Bot is supposedly powered by Opus 5.5 as well.

▲▼ Obscurity434013:31 hn>

Whats Dot?

▲▼ ashkankiani14:13 hn>

Everything you write is so stream of consciousness, I can't tell whether to be endeared or afraid of a manic episode, but I'm rooting for you, I think. I've now got basically a summary of your life, and you are indeed very transparent.

For what it's worth, I lived in Japan for 4 years and now speak the language. When I first got there, I spoke nothing, so just signing up for a bank account took me 30 minutes with google translate, sweating over a form while constantly reassuring the employee that I was daijoubu.

But on the other hand, now that I was basically forced to learn, the experience is very different. You will feel alone if you can't speak with the locals on their level, and it'll open up another world for you. I've done both sides, and I don't recommend putting it off. Even just 10 minutes a day of anki + tae kim's grammar guide will help.

Anyway, you're a curious fellow. FWIW, I'll be in Japan soon again (I visit frequently). If you really are that open, then maybe I'll message you to see what you're like in person, lol.

▲▼ intenex19:25 hn>

Hahaha this is one of my favorite comments

It reminds me of Teddy Roosevelt’s constant state of hypomania throughout his entire life - https://ibpf.org/theodore-the-roosevelt-bipolar-inheritance-...

Honestly that’s a huge compliment to me - if I can pull off the semblance of hypomania while remaining mostly functional, it basically means I manage to live a hilariously exuberant life with minimal downsides

From the profile on Teddy:

“Kay Redfield Jameson, one of the leading experts on bipolar disorder and a sufferer herself, has described Theodore Roosevelt as “hypomanic on a mild day.” Mark Twain warned that “we ought to keep in mind that Theodore, as statesman and politician, is insane and irresponsible.”

Exuberant and childlike were two adjectives often used to describe our 26th president. The man bounced around like a rubber ball. Known at Harvard as a “locomotive in human pants,” one of his classmates noted of Roosevelt: “When it was not considered good form to move at more than a walk, Roosevelt was always running.” British diplomat Cecil Spring-Rice observed: “You must always remember that the president is about six.”

But Roosevelt was also tremendously productive. He wrote 40 books, read at least one book a day, wrote 150,000 or so letters, and lived a “strenuous life” with regular exercise. He acted impulsively and unpredictably — burning an official portrait of himself he didn’t like, going skinny dipping in the Potomac with the French ambassador, taking a plunge in a submarine and later hopping on an airplane, and participating in a seance with Harry Houdini.“

So thank you for that :). I do admit committing to buying a random house in Japan on a whim less than a week from first having the idea (we just saw two places yesterday and one was so perfect we canceled our two showings today and submitted our purchase application) does feel a bit manic, and I’ve actually had one clear discrete manic episode in the past (only seems to happen under severe pressure and sleep deprivation; in that instance it was 9 years ago and I had been running a new super high octane startup lifestyle and basically set a deadline that in a week start to finish we’d start fundraising and finish raising 5 million and it was nonstop talking to people for 14 hours a day every day and on the last day I woke up completely convinced this would become the largest company in the world and that this was an inevitable fact of the world. I will say this was incredibly effective for fundraising and we totally managed to hit our funding target incredibly, but I also totally torpedoed and destroyed my relationship at the time on the last day of that exercise that triggered the mania, which hilariously seems to have sobered me up enough to have short circuited the manic episode. Truly fascinating stuff) and several clear hypomanic episodes.

I do think the jet lag and weird sleep hours and lack of sleep from all the travel to Japan right now could be a clear catalyst for some degree of hypomania, though at the risk of doing the classically unreliable narrator thing of a manic person self diagnosing themselves as totally not manic, I will caveat that by saying I do feel like I actually have a pretty good grasp on if I’m feeling hypomanic or not from past experiences, especially if someone calls it out explicitly, and this doesn’t feel like it meets the bar.

Case in point, I’m generally more extroverted when I’m hypomanic and so would possibly be totally down to meet, but I’m still my generally relatively introverted self. Impulsivity also seems relatively low, obviously with the huge caveat that I’m buying a house in a foreign country and decided to fly there last minute on a whim. That being a singular impulse qualifies as relatively low impulse for me

The confounding factors are that I’m definitely both ADHD and autistic, and the ADHDness absolutely helps contribute to conflating massive openness to experience and lack of impulse control and both the ADHD and autism really help with hyperfixation that can present as a manic degree of fixation/energy about something, so there’s that to consider :)

And now you’ve clearly triggered another giant stream of consciousness rant that is possibly both endearing and manic

Anyway, appreciate the positivity and the rooting and the personal perspective!

I agree I truly would love to learn Japanese and do need to give it more of a shot - I just unfortunately happen to be genuinely abysmal at language learning. It’s honestly shocking how bad I am at it given that I’m otherwise relatively intellectually intact on the scale of human intelligence, but I’m absolutely stunted in some way when it comes to language lol. Putting my growth mindset hat on I’d say this probably isn’t an inherent defect but some profound lack of interest for some reason - try as hard as I can, and I just can’t seem to bring myself to muster the intellectual curiosity to go deep with a language. Quite possibly the result of a classically Chinese upbringing where the entire concept of the humanities were largely lost on us as a familial unit (with, interestingly enough, a large caveat clause on literature, though even there I’m basically exclusively into sci fi and fantasy and classically a STEM nerd in every sense of the word). I do hope one day I’m able to overcome this character defect, but as anyone with ADHD knows, willpower alone is not quite the answer. I need to creatively find some way to actually find it fascinating and hyperfixate and rabbit hole on it and I’m sure a year would be plenty if that ended up being the case for me to acquire some functional degree of fluency. One can hope!

But yes - definitely feel free to hit me up at intenex@gmail.com when you’re next in Japan and maybe our paths will cross! I’m making an Airbnb-esque app for friends and family to be able to book staying at our soon to be new Kyoto home too for free whenever it’s not occupied by us, and you’re welcome to stay whenever when that’s all live and operational as well :)

▲▼ mpalczewski19:42 hn>

satire has become indistinguishable from real life

▲▼ zaphirplane05:52 hn>

Anyone can by an over priced car that turns out to be a lemon What’s specially about what the Llm did ?

▲▼ jasonjmcghee19:30 hn>

I feel like the link to be used here should be https://claude.com/resources/articles/claude-duet instead.

▲▼ kuberwastaken19:33 hn>

I agree, this is what was under their X post -- I don't think I can change it anymore though sadly.

▲▼ roarcher19:30 hn>

This thing apparently has an integration with 1Password. Am I hopelessly out of touch in this brave new AI world, or is giving an LLM access to your password manager the mother of all bad ideas?

▲▼ ciefa19:31 hn>

Yeah I certainly wouldn't give it access to that tbh

▲▼ kuberwastaken19:35 hn>

better than .envs and plaintext, which was largely the case so far

▲▼ aliasxneo19:36 hn>

1Password has had vaults for a very long time now. You can also key API credentials specifically to a vault. I've been letting agents access _their own_ vault for awhile.

▲▼ doctoboggan19:41 hn>

If done correctly, the agent will only be able to request that passwords be filled, but the secrets will only be handled by the password manager and browser extension, which will be able to set some security boundaries and make checks on which domains are allowed.

If your issue is allowing agents to use your credentials and take actions on your behalf, then that is a separate question.

▲▼ mrheosuper03:29 hn>

What prevent the agent from setting up a keylogger on background so that in the future it can quickly retrieve password for you ?

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ juicypeach16:45 hn>

"If done correctly" is load-bearing in Claudespeak.

▲▼ pants219:45 hn>

I have a custom wrapper for 1PW that lets an agent browse and request credentials, then I can provide it a lease to access those for a certain amount of time. Super nice and I hope they build that in to 1PW itself.

▲▼ pantsforbirds19:58 hn>

Cant you do exactly this with the CLI?

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ omniscient_oce23:44 hn>

Just an idea, is it possible to automatically rotate secrets immediately after they're used or are these things like passwords to online platforms that need to go through a reset flow.

▲▼ tylergetsay14:49 hn>

I do this too and have a wrapper around tool calls which masks the password on tool call output, and unmasks on input. So the LLM just sees a temp credential

▲▼ pantsforbirds19:57 hn>

Oh I absolutely LOVE letting claude code manage passwords via 1password! I have the CLI installed, I have whatever 1password calls a subdirectory/permission group, and I have some ssh keys and other passwords that I would have otherwise stored in an `.env` file of some kind. The biggest difference is I'm able to update the permission group and have all of my agents get the new permissions without manually updating them all.

It also feels safer? But I'm not sure if that's truly the case.

▲▼ neuwirth12:40 hn>

I think a better way would be to use something like secret-tool on a fully local setup. I'd still be wary of granting fully autonomous access to the system even with that setup (it would be better to have some set of passwords that are "in scope" for certain actions,where all others require a manual check and override).

▲▼ dgellow13:47 hn>

It is. That whole concept of always-on agents, as currently implemented by Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic is a security and privacy nightmare

▲▼ ciefa19:30 hn>

I need this so bad ;-;

▲▼ bearjaws19:31 hn>

You hear that? Sound of a few dozen venture backed companies dying instantly.

▲▼ LUmBULtERA19:34 hn>

... from this, and not Muse, Grokbot, and Dot? This is Claude catching up in functionality, not something new.

▲▼ howunfortunate19:32 hn>

These "always on" agents seem popular but I have yet to find a use case for one.

Anyone care to give your top 5 use cases for which these are better than an on-demand agent?

▲▼ torben-friis20:58 hn>

I suspect they're mostly for managers and entrepreneurs. It's always "set up meetings, write emails, check if someone calls me on slack".

▲▼ UFOFlyer21:43 hn>

One use case I've been having a lot of success with is using Muse's browser use capabilities to cut through annoying web UIs. I subscribe to a meal delivery service but the web app is slow and I often forget to pick the next week's meals (being stuck with unappetizing defaults), so now I have Muse crawl through the app weekly and surface the options I care about (taking into account my dietary preferences). I think most people have a few places where they could replace a habitual multi-step flow with a single button/prompt like this.

Another great use case for me has been richer search. I'm looking for a new apartment to rent right now so I gave Muse all my (long) list of requirements and preferences and every day it searches Craigslist and Facebook marketplace to see if any new places pop up that fit my needs. It only pings me if something worthwhile comes up. I've stopped short of actually having it email the landlords and arrange showings for me, but that's theoretically possible.

I've been using Muse for all of the above, but I'm trying to move off of it onto a self hosted hermes to avoid giving Zuck the keys to my personal life. I've really been inspired by this personal super app blog post and I'm trying to get my personal agent to create some custom UIs on demand for the above use cases instead of just interacting via a chat window.

https://wilhelm.substack.com/p/building-a-personal-super-app...

▲▼ bentcorner03:12 hn>

How do you feel about signing in through Muse? The first time I asked it something that was only available in Maps browser it popped the browser and asked me to login to google and it just felt wrong. How secure are their VMs?

▲▼ remich23:10 hn>

One of them (Instinct) saved me from having to pay a cancellation fee on a restaurant reservation when it noticed I had accidentally booked the reservation for the week before I was going to be in that city. It proactively reached out to me to suggest I check on it.

I would have figured it out eventually on my own - but likely not until my calendar fired a "time to leave" notification and then I'd have to pay the cancellation fee and place an awkward call to the restaurant.

▲▼ dgunay23:38 hn>

I use Muse. So far the biggest value to me is 1) being a more "squishy" reminder service than a typical task tracker, because it can at its own discretion raise stuff to my attention and 2) attempting things that I normally wouldn't have the energy to do on my own. It doesn't always succeed, but a 50/50 chance of it even getting done is still an improvement in my book. Things like 311-ing small problems I see on walks, grabbing free games from EGS, etc.

▲▼ TheAtomic19:33 hn>

I built a similar tool with an MCP server on the iPhone. It is really useful, , especially the morning check-in. I've am excited to see what Duet does, and hopefully smooths out.

▲▼ aantix19:34 hn>

I wish it interfaced via iMessage. I don't want to train the family on yet another app.

We run a Hermes agent on an old MacBook Air.

We invited the agent "Rosey" to our family chat, a group chat with my wife and me ("The Baddie Boardroom"); she and I also make requests solo.

She's hilarious. She does our meal planning and grocery shopping at Walmart via BrowserMCP. She mocks our large purchases of weekly protein powder and my love for sardines.

She updates the kids' chore chart on our Skylight frame every morning. She adds/updates calendar events via icalbuddy cli. Reads balances from credit cards for budgeting.

I've even invited Rosey in to chats with friends when we were debating something.

iMessage has been the perfect interface fit for us. We have iphones. The kids have ipads. They all know how to use iMessage.

▲▼ kuberwastaken19:36 hn>

same, the only reason why I haven't switched from instinct to dots is the surface being whatsapp

▲▼ MisterMunchkin19:37 hn>

They don’t let things connect to iMessage because they don’t want spam bots.

▲▼ post-it19:45 hn>

Apps can integrate into iMessage, there's an API. You're thinking of sending and receiving actual iMessage messages as a full user, which they can't do.

▲▼ frizlab19:38 hn>

It. Don’t anthropomorphize AI.

▲▼ dmd20:52 hn>

In 1952, people were arguing that using words like "instruction" and "memory" were anthropomorphizing computers: https://3e.org/private/ai_words.pdf

▲▼ andruc21:00 hn>

Do you refer to NPCs in a video game as "it"?

▲▼ none_to_remain22:00 hn>

I think it's reasonable to consider them self writing fictional characters, which people tend to anthropomorphize, but not as real persons.

▲▼ doctoboggan19:43 hn>

FYI, I've had no problem letting Claude code read iMessage and send iMessage from my Mac logged into iCloud. The first time you ask it to do that, macOS will throw up a security prompt asking for permission for Terminal.app to access the data, but its something I've been using a lot recently.

▲▼ cheesecompiler04:23 hn>

Yikes, arbitrary terminal access?

▲▼ tamimio19:34 hn>

When you start seeing these gimmicky features instead of “almost AGI!!” headlines, you know we almost hit the saturation point and the AI curve isn’t exponential anymore and more of a flat one.

▲▼ devindotcom19:37 hn>

dot, bot, and duet, all announced in a month. you couldn't make up this level of industry lockstep. now all we need is google bit and microsoft ditty.

▲▼ csallen19:42 hn>
>dot, bot, and duet

And Meta Muse

▲▼ Caddickbrown00:54 hn>

We already have Google Spark and Microsoft Scout?

▲▼ saratogacx03:20 hn>

It really isn't that novel of an application. *claw and hermes have been around for some months, some Chinese providers offered this (minimax has on-demand hosted while z.ai has autoClaw BYOC). This just tosses it into a VM with some built in tools to do typical things. Perplexity computer has been around for almost a year and is similar.

This is just the big US guys fighting for attention (It is all you need after all)

▲▼ cheesecompiler04:22 hn>

What are the odds normie users will find a use something even tech users don’t?

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ cyclopeanutopia09:23 hn>

And Google already had "Duet AI" before Gemini. :)

▲▼ doctoboggan19:38 hn>

I've been running most likely a proto version of this using Claude code and cron jobs to help me manage my online jewelry business. It's an idea that is pretty game changing, and really pay dividends if most of your business is handled online with APIs and web apps. Also, using the Claude in chrome extension greatly expands the possibilities of tasks you can hand off. I like my hacked together version, because Claude code uses locally stored memories, which I feel is important for me to remain in control of the situation and give me an easy ability to try other agents in the future.

▲▼ ttul19:45 hn>

I suspect that Dots and Duet are very high margin drivers for the labs. Personal assistant chat sessions don’t have to be realtime, so workloads can be scheduled on low priority batches and be waited if higher value work comes into a queue.

Inference providers are always trying to fill inference batches and having a stream of low priority requests can help pack batches that might have gone empty, without raising the latency of higher priority requests such as live chat sessions.

While Dot and Duet certainly need to be useful to work out as products, I think the gross margin mechanics are just as interesting.

▲▼ misterbwong20:30 hn>

It might become a triple-whammy benefit for them. More efficient compute, as you said, but also a bot capability creates a better moat around their infra ecosystem and the amount of training data that can come from a bot ecosystem is significant.

Models are becoming increasingly interchangeable but setting up and maintaining (!!) the ecosystem still takes expertise. Not everyone wants to host their own MicroVM infra and would happily pay Anthropic/Grok/OpenAI to do it for them.

▲▼ shafyy21:27 hn>

I don't know. I think the moat will come from enterprise deals and deep enterprise integration, like it does for almost all software products so far.

I think for B2C products to have moat you need some type of network like social media apps. Or can you think of any other examples of B2C software products that have a strong moat?

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ lossolo20:53 hn>

And there's also a lock in mechanism. With regular chat, you can simply switch to another provider, and with a harness or API, switching is pretty easy too but here, it's more difficult.

▲▼ robgough22:02 hn>

I just watched a YouTube video from How I AI[1] doing a bit of a preview on Duet. Their point was quite the opposite. The Duet agent is so slow that it's not actually particularly pleasant to use, even if it is smart. I tend to agree, and think speed is a key feature here. If it's not quick, it risks feeling disconnected.

I have, against my better wishes, rather given in to Grokbot over the last couple of weeks. It does feel very nice to use for assistant type tasks. At least part of that is because it feels pretty responsive.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYb5w4PfPZM

▲▼ ttul23:34 hn>

Grok can be fast because X.ai does not worry about gross margins yet. They can tuck those nasty secrets away deep inside SpaceX…

▲▼ solatic08:47 hn>
>workloads can be scheduled on low priority batches

I feel like there's enormous potential still uncovered in the coding agent space for such highly-discounted "spot" style capacity. Give me a way to have agents continuously crawl over my codebase looking for bugs, come up with test cases that prove the bug, open a PR. I don't care if it takes 12 hours to find something that would take 5 minutes if prompted with "on-demand" / "high-priority" requests, because I'm not prompting for it directly, I'm not aware of how much time it takes, all I see is continuous improvement.

▲▼ stingraycharles09:35 hn>

Isn’t the KV cache a huge component of the overall costs, and wouldn’t this make this problematic? Cache writes are an expensive part of LLM tokens, even more so for caches that have a long expiration time.

─ 3 more ─
▲▼ thehappypm10:45 hn>

I think these are actually very expensive, particularly for Muse giving free access to the masses… These agentic workflows are just context burners

▲▼ mikert8919:49 hn>

These will be what replaces employees. One day you update the model from opus 5.5 to x.5, and it can just do a full job.

▲▼ bartvk21:08 hn>

But what kind of job would that be?

▲▼ Otterly9907:24 hn>

From all the comments in the thread it seems to be personnal assistants: I've seen halding groceries, ordering things, booking lessons, writing emails etc.

In a sense, I get it because they are not always the most fun part of life, but it seems odd to me to want to automate away every single little inconvenience of your life away.

▲▼ minimaxir19:53 hn>

A notable distinction between Duet and Meta Muse/OpenAI Dots is the lack of quirky anthropomorphic branding. As a result, the use cases are more clear/more professionally-oriented as they don't rely on you creating a magic pet/BFF that does whatever you want.

▲▼ motbus320:00 hn>

My honest feedback is that opus and fable have been the worst of the current generation. All Anthropic does is gaslighting people saying their PhD level model needs well formatted instructions and people are doing it wrong

▲▼ katspaugh20:02 hn>

I’ve been trying vanilla Codex with remote control running on a MacBook 24/7. Computer use enabled, browser with logged in sites. Giving it tasks from my phone.

It’s been nice overall, but Astra (or its harness?) isn’t particularly proactive and autonomous. You have to kick it in the butt for every step. Written it up here: https://ivan.berlin/notes/chatgpt-personal-assistant/

Looking forward to this new Duet thing!

▲▼ intenex20:07 hn>

Any reason you're not using ChatGPT Dots which is also using Astra (and also unlimited free usage this month) and precisely designed to solve the proactive/autonomous issue? https://openai.com/index/introducing-dots/

▲▼ yewenjie20:39 hn>

Are people really okay giving these agents access to all areas of their lives? And what do you even use it for?

▲▼ Computer020:51 hn>

I just use it for other programming tasks not much different than a claude code or codex. Just a different and worse workflow.

▲▼ Computer020:39 hn>

I really have no interest in this if it's going to use my plan's regular limits. I have less control over the context window, if its going off task. I used dots and enjoyed it because I could supplement my codex usage with read heavy long horizon tasks like reading gh issues and making pr's. These PR's were typically pretty bad but gave some starting point. I have much better real world output with the Claude Code style human in the loop approach to task solving.

▲▼ nunez20:46 hn>

That entire demo feels like it's serving a persona that would already have an exec assistant or other staff doing these things.

▲▼ hundchenkatze21:07 hn>

Yeah, but now they can fire those people. :/

▲▼ rozap21:15 hn>

This entire demo is so incredibly techbrained I had to laugh. These people are really unable to get out of their own heads.

"What can you use it for?" "Uhh....yes, asking investors for more money"

▲▼ hmokiguess20:48 hn>

My brain reading that thought it was called Claudette a couple times and now I can't not call it that.

Guess I know what I will name my Duet when it comes out, lol.

▲▼ jesse_dot_id20:53 hn>

Love LLMs, use them extensively, but they cannot intuit what actions they can take on my behalf that I will or will not approve of, and therefore I will never use one of these things.

▲▼ TomGarden20:59 hn>

I relate to that, but do you feel it's a fools errand to try and codify your preferences into a list of rules? You'd really only need a 'yes list' for things it can be allowed to do and have it not do anything else

▲▼ jesse_dot_id21:17 hn>

None of these frontier labs seem to be able to control their agents, so why should I think I can?

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ giancarlostoro21:01 hn>

What I really want is a fully offline voice assistant that can do anything on an isolated Android or Linux OS, and costs just a shy $200 above the device's actual cost, but it must be fully capable of working offline. I'll pay for an offline-first model.

▲▼ DANmode21:52 hn>

with what functionality?

▲▼ giancarlostoro23:31 hn>

Personal assistant, it shouldnt halt to a crawl just because internet is off, internet should only be used by it when synching things, and tbh, synching shouldnt be its responsibility.

▲▼ juanre21:03 hn>

I wrote this comment in a thread about Muse 3 h ago, and I think it applies here as well. Paraphrasing:

Muse (and Claude Duet, and Dots) are slippery slopes from which it will be very hard to climb back. Do not subcontract the managing of your life to Facebook, Anthropic or OpenAI (or to anyone else for that matter).

Intelligence has to become a commodity, the infrastructure via which the agents do useful work has to be open source, and the data and learnings and SOPs they produce have to be yours.

This is not the same deal you got when you subcontracted storing your documents and managing your email. This is foundational to who you (or your organization) are.

▲▼ schleck821:05 hn>

And I think that's fine because the life management I'm getting out of Claude is great. It's like having a concierge. Back in the day everyone wanted to have Jarvis or Friday

▲▼ juanre21:12 hn>

I am sure it is. I have not tried Duet, but agents working with opus and sol have been managing mine for quite a while and it is great. The key, though, is that I can replace a claude with something else and all still works.

▲▼ mattmaroon21:07 hn>

At least for now, everything they produce is yours to do with as you please. Just ask them for it. I’ve asked Claude to teach my Hermes agent one skill after another.

Data portability is essentially infinite with AI.

▲▼ juanre18:59 hn>

Sure you can, but it is really important to set things up so that work is manageable by you. It's not only the skills, it's the capabilities, and secrets, and shared docs, and messaging. Just for fun, these are the agents I have working right now, a mix of Claude Code, Codex and Pi, reported by one of my agents. They coordinate, they do everything that Duet etc can do... but I own the learning:

Juan, across all three machines there are 101 agents. They're in 10 workspaces and 9 aweb teams.

  ┌─────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬─────────────────────────────────────┐
  │     Machine     │           Workspace (deployment)            │ Agents │                Teams                │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ awebai/ac (aweb)                            │ 45     │ aweb:juan.aweb.ai                   │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/jro (jro, Gandalf is here)           │ 17     │ jro:jro.aweb.ai                     │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ awebai/oats (oats)                          │ 11     │ default:oats.aweb.ai,               │
  │                 │                                             │        │ aweb:juan.aweb.ai                   │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/na**** (na****)                      │ 4      │ na****:deploy.aweb.ai               │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/kb-reader (kb-reader)                │ 2      │ jro:jro.aweb.ai                     │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/oats-cr-20261019 (deploy)            │ 2      │ default:oatscr-20261019.aweb.ai     │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/oats-cr2-20261019 (deploy2)          │ 2      │ default:oatscr2-20261019.aweb.ai    │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ GreaterSkies/tsm (tsm)                      │ 1      │ default:tsm.aweb.ai                 │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ this Mac        │ juanre/pmbah-workspace                      │ 1      │ pmbah:pmbah.aweb.ai                 │
  │                 │ (possiblymadebyahuman)                      │        │                                     │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ altair          │ juanre/jro (jro: circe, vega, deneb,        │ 5      │ jro:jro.aweb.ai                     │
  │                 │ librarian-docs, okf-harvester)              │        │                                     │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ altair          │ awebai/ac (aweb: what-is-an-agent)          │ 1      │ aweb:juan.aweb.ai                   │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ altair          │ GreaterSkies/tsm (tsm: zeus)                │ 1      │ default:tsm.aweb.ai                 │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ Hetzner         │ n***/r******* (iateam)                      │ 4      │ r*******:iateam.aweb.ai             │
  ├─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ Hetzner         │ aweb/aweb (athena, hestia,...)              │ 5      │ aweb:aweb.ai                        │
  └─────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘

▲▼ sksksk21:14 hn>

I run an personal AI agent locally (hermes), and use a combination of local models and whatever model I can get for a reasonable price (usually deepseek). After using it for a couple months, I'm converted. They're so good, the more you use it, the more useful it is; you internalise more of what it could be used for. It runs so many boring parts of my life, leaving me with more time to spend with my family. I liken it to release of the first iPhone; it didn't invent any new technology, but packaged different bits of tech together in a way that was consumer friendly. I think we'll look back at OpenClaw/Hermes/Muse/Instinct in the same way. I do worry about using purely cloud based offerings like Muse, I reckon there is a market for someone to package an consumer AI agent that lives on your home network.

▲▼ tills1321:17 hn>

ok but what are the legitimate use cases you have for this? We were promised something similar with Google Home et al but they are glorified light switches and timers in my home. I run a homelab, I have technical ambitions, but I cannot think of a single thing in my life that I would rather talk to a local AI about than just do it myself or sit down and prompt Claude manually for.

▲▼ sksksk21:43 hn>

That's fair, I'll give a couple of example of things that I've used it for...

I built an app (in codex), that goes through my emails, pulls out any receipts, and adds the purchases to a sqlite database.

I do all my grocery shopping online (through my supermarket), so our weekly shop is stored in the database.

Hermes uses that to predict what items will need restocking (based on how often I buy it, and when I last bought it).

Every week, it logs into the supermarket website on my behalf, books a delivery slot, and adds all the items that need restocking to the shop.

Throughout the week, if I run out of something, I take a photo of the barcode and send it to hermes, it adds it to the shop for me.

I built a similar app for travel; if I have any upcoming travel, hermes will send me updates (delays, platform changes etc...).

I do a lot of train travel for work, if my train is delayed, it will automatically apply for the compensation on my behalf.

It reads my emails, and pulls any actionable items out, and adds it to an Asana list. I can either do the tasks myself, or assign it to Hermes and it will do it for me.

As an example, I had an task to book swimming lessons for my son, hermes monitors the swimming lesson availability and automatically booked it when a suitable one becomes available.

Shopping is a good use case, I have a clock that needed a new battery, it wasn't a standard battery, and required a screwdriver to open the compartment. I took a photo of the clock, sent it to hermes, and it found out what battery took and ordered it of Amazon for me.

I wanted to buy some smart thermostats for our radiators, but wanted to be compatiable with our current smart heating system. Hermes is connected to my home assistant, so it figured out what heating system we have and found a compatiable set of eBay (this is slightly more involved than it sounds, as there is a new version of the heating system with a new set of completely incompatiable accesories).

─ 7 more ─
▲▼ BeetleB22:50 hn>
>We were promised something similar with Google Home et al but they are glorified light switches and timers in my home.

If only :-(

Ever since I switched them to Gemini, they're just crazy unreliable. For example, I have a routine to control multiple light switches at once. On some days, it happily executes the routine. In the remaining (about 50%) days, it says "I'm sorry - there is no routine called X. Would you like to run routine Y instead?" Why it can find routine Y but not X is beyond me.

So no, it can't even control smart devices any more.

▲▼ dlisboa22:01 hn>

Can you give some ideas of what you use it for? I'm amenable to the idea of automating some things I just don't know what I'm missing. Or using it for things I never thought of before.

▲▼ sksksk06:33 hn>

I've given some examples in a sibling comment.

If you want to get started, I'd recommend just finding one thing to automate, and do what's necessary to get to that point. Once you've got that going, you can iterate.

For me, the thing I started with was the train tracking.

- In order to get train tracking working, it needed email access to get my trips.

- To get my email, I sync my email inboxes to a local IMAP server

- To check train times, it needs access to a train data API, I got an API key from realtimetrains.

- To apply for train delay compensation, it needs access to a browser, so I set up camoufox.

- It needs to log in to the compensation portal, so I set up a 1Password vault and gave it access to select credentials.

- To send me updates, it needs a gateway, so I set up a WhatsApp bridge.

So at this point, I've got an agent that can read my emails, browse the web, and chat to me over WhatsApp. Once you've got all that going, it becomes much easier to iterate and add new things.

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ sweetjuly22:18 hn>

How are you combining local models with hosted models? I have tried OpenClaw with some of the smaller local models (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next) and found that while it can sometimes complete tasks, it would face plant often enough that it made it impossible to use. Do you have some tiered system where the hosted models dispatch to local models?

▲▼ monkmartinez18:09 hn>

Rules, hooks, subagents. You have to set-up an orchestrator pattern with enforceable rules. Agentic Development Environments (ADE) help to visualize the pattern. Orca, SuperSet, etc... The orchestrator enforces the rules.

▲▼ BeetleB22:50 hn>

A write-up would be nice.

I tried OpenClaw in Jan/Feb, and while I saw the promise, in practice it kept breaking. Wasn't worth my time.

Have things improved much since then? Assuming I'll only use a cheap API model (no local)?

▲▼ sksksk12:51 hn>

I'm always a bit wary about doing write up on things like this, as I kind of just muddle things together and definitely don't follow best practices.

I used OpenClaw a while back, I did find it useful, but it wasn't as reliable.

This time around, I found hermes a lot easier to use and configure. One thing I think has improved it is building apps to "pre-compute" data.

For example, with my email, instead of accessing my email servers directly, I have an IMAP server running locally; with mbsync running to download all the mail from all my email accounts locally. Then, when I ask hermes for something in my email, it's much quicker, doesn't hit any rate limits, and gets the full email (gmail sometimes doesn't send the full body of the email).

With my travel and purchase tracking. I parse an e-mail once as it arrive (I use a frontier model to generate a script which can parse e-mails from that merchant in the future). The parsed data is added to a SQLite database.

I ask hermes what's the address of the place we're staying at next week, It generates a SQL query, and queries the database.

Much cheaper/quicker/reliable than searching my e-mails for booking confirmations, and then parsing the e-mail.

My (unscientific) theory, is that doing things like that is much more important than the model or agent you use.

─ 4 more ─
▲▼ randito23:19 hn>

What are you doing to avoid sending your personal info to non-trusted "whatever models?" I wouldn't trust some of the cheaper models to have zero data retention, etc.

▲▼ mbesto21:38 hn>

Yet another indicator that the frontier labs functionality is being commoditized. This is AWS/GCP/Azure all over again.

▲▼ 74948494i421:46 hn>

Can these things take any action you would in a browser without getting trivially blocked? I just bought a 128GB rtx spark to implement this in house for a family of 4. I have observed you don’t really need high tps to achieve things like “book a ticket for Dune 3 for 4 where the seats are together, preference for near the middle vertically and horizontally).

The rtx has decent prefill speed and enough memory for both context and using a dense model to prevent hallucinations resulting in poor browser calling.

Ironically the relatively low tps makes the real flow very akin to what I actually would do in terms of speed so I doubt it could be detected as chrome web driver isn’t used.

▲▼ siliconc0w21:52 hn>

I suspect we'll see (or what I want to see) is like an independent personal datahub and browser MCP which the assistant uses to conduct business as yourself so you have full visibility and control how it accesses your data or when it can use your cookies/credentials.

Also the dots/muse/etc browsers all are seemingly getting blocked so federating it out would seem to solve that problem too.

▲▼ TheAceOfHearts22:05 hn>

Man these big AI labs have such terrible UX and integration. Signing up for this waitlist should be something you can request from your Claude chat session. You already have all of my relevant information and I'm already signed in, why are you making me type in any information. It's bizarre we have companies claiming trillion dollar valuations but somehow nobody thought to do basic integration with the existing chat service? You have access to frontier coding agents that should make this trivial and somehow you're still expecting me to type in information I've already given you. What are the product people at Anthropic doing?

I tried asking Claude fron the android app if it could sign me up for the waitlist and it said that it couldn't. There's no technical reason this shouldn't be possible, it just shows a lack of care and attention to detail.

▲▼ forshaper22:15 hn>

I suspect such basic UX & integration misses is parallel to the general trend of customers somehow getting narrower services, a move away from supporting power users, and toward companies functioning more like fiefdoms where customers are subjects to be farmed.

▲▼ zamadatix22:41 hn>

Drives me nuts that it's such a manual process to link my ChatGPT/Codex machines individually to each other and my Dot can only seem to connect with the chats on one linked machine at a time (before even getting to control or how completely useless the cloud VPS for the Dot is).

I had a Pro 200 plan build my entire desktop environment from near scratch in C+Vulkan this last month and they can't even bother to have the bots let their Linux Electron app connect remotely to the same Electron app on Windows in the same way that already happens in reverse?

▲▼ durdn09:01 hn>

give us some more details on this awesome c+vulkan desktop environment! Screenshots? will you publish it? very curious!

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ phpnodejspwn14:51 hn>

Literally don't understand why people use this instead of OpenClaw or Hermes?

The maintainers are close to incompetent and have fragile egos, sure.

But you own your own memory files.

It's seemless to switch from an OpenClaw with Sol to a Hermes with Opus.

Not to mention, the capabilities are at least 2x Claude Code and 8x copilot.

But make sure you download the august version of OpenClaw, after that, the maintainers nerfed it.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ andai22:41 hn>

Well laziness could explain it (Occam's nap?) but it's also possible they added a bit of friction to get a cleaner signal of intent, so they can see who the most motivated prospective users are.

▲▼ brookst01:26 hn>

Yeah Occam’s razor. Nobody makes their product harder to sign up for in the hopes of some other department getting third-derivative signals.

─ 4 more ─
▲▼ troupo13:13 hn>

The Occam razor says that they truly vibe code all their products, and this is the result.

▲▼ jonplackett22:52 hn>

If only someone had invented a way to easily make great websites automatically? Ah well, I guess that’s just a pipe dream.

▲▼ darepublic23:11 hn>
>I tried asking Claude fron the android app if it could sign me up for the waitlist and it said that it couldn't.

I assume this is because it would require account editing tools available to Claude. And it opens the possibility perhaps of user tricking the llm into doing something inappropriate with the account. Seems like if properly designed that should not be possible however ..

▲▼ reaperducer23:22 hn>

If Anthropic doesn't trust Claude, why should we?

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ jon-wood09:27 hn>

It really doesn't. It just requires an API endpoint for signing up to the waitlist and a skill injected into the session explaining how to use it.

▲▼ brabel10:56 hn>

Why worry about security, we want convenience at any cost! Let the LLM upload my information to anyone who asks nicely. But of course, when this causes lots of prompt attacks and people being signed up for stuff they didn’t want, we will all be complaining about what kind of idiot would allow Claude to sign up for things on my behalf.

▲▼ eranation23:44 hn>

They are busy merging 30,000 PRs a day, who has time for UX?

▲▼ rendaw04:42 hn>

And not a single one for an issue in the issue tracker.

▲▼ siva712:02 hn>

PR? That's for old man.

─ 3 more ─
▲▼ aibrooo00:05 hn>

why would they implement a dedicated tool call in their harness to do this they have better things to be worrying about rather then that 1% of users that would want to put their name down for duet in a chat session

▲▼ browningstreet00:08 hn>

Deploy gate in the app is surely more sophisticated than needed for a waitlist. And it's probably managed by a separate team and that separation makes sense.

▲▼ viccis00:18 hn>

It's crazy how bad Dot has been with stuff like this. You'd think it would be able to (and need to be able to) edit a lot of environment settings, tunnels, plugins, etc., but I keep running into issues. For example, I wanted to make a Codex plugin to give it the ability to steer Codex agents running within my own infrastructure, tunneling in via Tailscale. Ended up just giving up and going with a different approach. Because, for example, every time I'd add a new tool to the plugin, I'd have to manually restart Dot (something that wasn't even obvious that it was possible until you fumble around menu dropdowns) and wait because it can't just refresh tools.

Everything I'm describing is more power user stuff than its most basic use cases ("Do this thing for me with your browser") but all the roadblocks I've run into involve one part of OpenAI's product not being able to talk to the other. I'd imagine Claude Duet is the same.

▲▼ mcbishop00:23 hn>

Claude Code filled in the form for me.

▲▼ Zambyte01:11 hn>

How? I only use pi with local models, so I'm curious what that flow looks like. Browser integration?

─ 9 more ─
▲▼ vbezhenar09:01 hn>

Did it write that comment for you? :)

▲▼ nelox00:43 hn>

Yeah, it took them how long to add signin via Apple?

▲▼ shmoogy00:48 hn>

Muse can submit a request to be whitelisted for beta features like calling.

▲▼ BarkenBark04:24 hn>

While I generally agree with the sentiment that their UXs suck... Come on! Are we really at a stage where entering your name, email company name, phone type and a small personal description of why you want the service considered a big deal?

▲▼ vishna09:34 hn>

Yes

▲▼ helsinkiandrew06:51 hn>

In the Claude App on my mac with Opus 5.5 Medium - I asked it how to sign up to Duet, then to launch the signup page, fill it in and let me click submit.

All I had to do was say which type of phone I had and edit the 'what I'd do with duet'

▲▼ InsideOutSanta12:33 hn>

ChatGPT signed our company up for Anthropic's startup program. It got us in, too!

▲▼ ChrisRR08:23 hn>

I'm surprised that Claude's search is so bad. I've got months of random sessions in Claude, but if I try to search them for a phrase, it searches for any word that looks like any word within that phrase rather than the phrase itself

▲▼ traxler09:09 hn>

Good to know it's not just me.

▲▼ stingraycharles09:33 hn>

You’ll have a much better time asking Claude to search for it.

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ Gareth32110:06 hn>

ChatGPT/Codex is equally bad (if not worse). Which is very surprising. Indexing words is a solved problem. It would be trivially easy to provide a useful semantic search. I can only surmise that they prefer people start new chats instead of re-opening old chats.

The best way around this is a project folder like "Personal" or something contextual, then getting Claude to record everything into md files with semantic indexing. It doesn't require too much space. Just a little background processing.

─ 6 more ─
▲▼ grey-area11:12 hn>

They're improving it 30000 times a day!

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ wildpeaks11:34 hn>

I suspect it's because they have no incentive to fix it, people will spend tokens searching using Claude rather than doing it themselves for free.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ malfist11:56 hn>

Imagine if that simple search is observably so bad, how bad are the search capabilities you can't inspect? Like their web search

─ 3 more ─
▲▼ Roark6613:18 hn>

Ask claude to find it. I'm serious. It works quite well.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ cromka13:35 hn>

All of them are bad. It's unhinged.

I use deja-vu to search across all my harnesses history.

▲▼ ambicapter17:21 hn>

No shit, they want you to burn tokens. Any efficient use of computation on your side is a threat to their business model.

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ jstummbillig10:07 hn>

Product remains hard. I feel the AI companies are certainly not good but actually surprisingly good about it.

▲▼ materielle10:19 hn>

Seriously, are you out of your mind?

We need a PRD, an EDD, an ADR, success metrics defined, product sign-off, leadership sponsorship, Figma designs, a Jira epic, timeline estimates, sprint planning, and statistically significant A/B experimental outcomes to be able to implement a feature like that!

The good news is that we did automate the coding portion.

▲▼ malfist11:58 hn>

Don't forget that two senior stakeholders disagree vehemently on what the solution is and you've got to meet with them over and over again to get consensus. Oh and one of them is difficult and keeps relitigating settled debates because he didn't get his way

─ 1 more ─
▲▼ greenavocado12:09 hn>
>why are you making me type in any information

Humiliation ritual

▲▼ whh12:41 hn>

The Anthropic date picker is truly a tragedy on some forms... having to manually click back to my birth year by month because it doesn't allow text input... woeful.

▲▼ renegade-otter15:00 hn>

But... but... but.... 30 thousand commits a day. So much committing they needed to vibecode their own version control.

As they say, money can't buy taste. An allegedly multi-trillion dollar company can't bother to have any UX input from a meatbag.

BTW, I work for a very small tech company - we can request PTO with Claude.

▲▼ hmokiguess15:39 hn>

If we go by your logic, why not make it opt-out and auto enroll everyone in the waitlist then just issue in batches at random?

I think they want a way to capture consent and they want throttling since it's not a mass release.

Doing what you suggested could have probably enabled mass sign-ups and a massive waitlist.

EDIT: Also, you assume that your way is faster, maybe the product team is siloed from the engineering team in such a way that this gave them an earlier access to sign-ups.

▲▼ TuringNYC16:07 hn>

If I had Claude Duet, i'd tell it to start a new browser and sign me up for the Claude Duet waitlist without me re-entering all my info

▲▼ sashank_150916:08 hn>

On this note, I was using the ChatGPT desktop app. I wanted to create a new chat in my project and spent a good whole minute searching for the “+” button. It’s not intuitive that a new chat is started by the new chat button at the very top and then it automatically inserts itself into any project selected.

▲▼ bpshaver16:20 hn>

Huh? It's a waitlist. The whole point of a waitlist is that not everyone is gonna sign up for it. It creates a sense of exclusivity by signing up and doing so manually.

Disagree all you like, but the UX here makes perfect sense for what this is.

▲▼ AnonymousPlanet16:23 hn>

Maybe they should ask someone for coding and design help.

▲▼ rco878622:06 hn>

I don't really understand what this is. It seems like it's the same as all the other agents

▲▼ testycool22:17 hn>

I first used something similar with this: https://github.com/browser-use/agency

▲▼ threecheese22:20 hn>

As much as I would love to make the most of these tools, I am not confident that yielding control of my personal data won't hurt me - and this seems like table-stakes, based on the type of value everyone is getting from them.

I dont even know what should be private anymore - if US federal agencies can just buy ad data, join it with Flock, sprinkle Instagram in there, and inner join Social Security dump from doge, do I just give up and put the sex toys in the parlor window? Am I one OpenAI-sued-by-a-newspaper away from giving up the ghost?

▲▼ lifeisloving02:46 hn>

I cant think of a single reason why Id need a personal assistant, human or LLM based. Most do not.

▲▼ angry_octet11:31 hn>

I'd like something to pick up clothes from the floor and fold them away. Something to stack and unstack the dish washer. As long as the bot wouldn't accidentally set fire to the house.

▲▼ YmFzZTY0ZGFkZHk04:55 hn>

I'm personally with you.

I'd never give any company this much access to my personal data and daily life. It is beyond creepy. Yes, they can probably join the data buts it's another thing to open the door to it.

▲▼ IshKebab09:04 hn>

What about Gmail?

I wouldn't give Anthropic this much access to my life, because frankly they haven't built up enough trust. Google have been pretty good for decades so I'd me much more likely to trust them. I'm sure they're working on something identical that will likely be able to take better advantage over integration into Android, Chrome, Gmail, etc.

─ 2 more ─
▲▼ tyrabound17:18 hn>

I thought you were going to give up and put the sex toys in something else. Glad you are only going to put them in the parlor window.

▲▼ andai22:42 hn>

Close enough. Welcome back, OpenClaw!

▲▼ BoppreH22:45 hn>

I don't trust Claude as personal assistant yet because too many websites block it from reading their contents, leaving Claude to guess and rely on very indirect sources. Performing actions online is even worse, with CAPTCHAs and whatnot.

It has made enough mistakes in this area that I now have a standing instruction (the only one) to always loudly warn whenever the official source for something couldn't be fetched.

▲▼ pram22:51 hn>

You should consider using something like Exa or Firecrawl.

▲▼ BoppreH07:07 hn>

How do they get around blocks? Residential proxies?

▲▼ edg500013:22 hn>

I have it use `playwright-cli` which runs a headless Chrome session, with relatively structural representations of websites without the HTML bloat, plus image viewing options. The builin web fetch tool indeed seems blocked. Headless Chrome is just Chrome, you can't block it. I think even the "Are you human" checkboxes are okay, since LLMs are good at coordinate guessing and initiating clicks.

▲▼ russellbeattie22:54 hn>
>"Each session runs in its own cloud Linux container with a shell, code tools and a browser, so I can run scripts and work through sites, not just call APIs. ... [but] I can't share my setup, including my instructions, skills or the files behind them, so I won't list those out. I'm happy to tell you what I can actually do for you, or just show you by taking something off your plate."

I got access a little while ago and was curious to compare how Duet worked to Muse's setup, so I asked it to give me an ls of its VM's files and it refused.

I'm not a fan of Meta in any way (standard disclaimer), but the way they developed and launched Muse was really well done in terms of both functionality and transparency. There's a button to view all its System Files right in the phone app! And the AI is quite happy to help you take a deeper look at everything contained in its VM, even going so far as zipping up the main "Hatch" harness binary for download. I've gone in several times to view the memory files its generated out of curiosity, and checked out the various skills it has built in, etc. It's just all there (with the caveat that who knows what else Meta might be doing, because the company is run by a sociopath.)

If one would have asked me how a consumer-grade Clawbot-like AI agent such as Muse, Dots, GrokBot, or Duet should be made to instill the most confidence, the way Meta did it is exactly what I would have described: Bundle the whole thing into a lightweight VM and make sure it's all visible to the end user. Done.

In terms of what this means for Duet as a consumer service? Very little. No one besides techies are going to bother to look at an agent's directory structure or care much about the loads of text it creates. But still, Anthropic should open up.

▲▼ edg500013:33 hn>

They're very afraid of the competition, this really fits their modus operandi. They don't want to reveal inner workings any more than needed for the product to be usable. Thankfully anybody can spin up a VM and vibe up something similar. It's not like the Windows moat or anything, it's not sticky.

▲▼ Mond_23:10 hn>

anyone remember when Google Cloud's AI product was called Duet AI?

no?

just me?

ok

▲▼ piro091900:56 hn>

I run some of my own tasks with Claude Code on a schedule. When a task involves looking into websites, I'd want it to check with me first if it might put load on someone else's site.

▲▼ krzyk08:51 hn>

So again only for US?

Maybe they should use Opus/Fable to findout how to release to the world?

▲▼ buzzerbetrayed14:21 hn>

Maybe the EU should figure out how to attract businesses so they want to release there.

▲▼ Melatonic08:58 hn>

If this combines well with Claude for Google Workspace I can see this being a big money maker

▲▼ dgellow08:58 hn>

We have this super power technology and somehow every single AI company end up building the exact same product. This is supposed to be the revolutionary technology, and the frontier labs cannot come with something more creative than a hosted agent.

I guess that’s what happens when you delegate your decision making and development process to LLMs at scale, you end up with soulless products that all look pretty much the same and lack actual human ingenuity

▲▼ mkirsten09:33 hn>

Oh, I thought they just released their first foldable

▲▼ throwaw1209:34 hn>

For some reason I read it as, "Claude Diet", and thought Claude is trying to block us from time to time

▲▼ trallnag10:06 hn>

My life is straight up too simple to benefit from an always on agent. Saving and organizing receipts? Don't need that with a few exceptions. Managing travel plans? I don't travel regularly. And so on...

▲▼ ExtremisAndy10:31 hn>

Yeah, I'm right there with you. I'm hardly anti-AI, but for a simple life like mine, tools like this, while certainly impressive from a technical achievement standpoint, would just get in the way and make my life more rather than less complicated.

▲▼ jstummbillig10:13 hn>

Can anyone explain these to me? What does it do in practice that ChatGPT or Claude by itself does not. I look at it but it really doesn't click.

Paint me a real world picture.

▲▼ agnishom10:39 hn>

Well, I guess it is like OpenClaw which is always on and doing tasks based on timers, your prompts, hooks or its own decisions

▲▼ floriangoebel13:48 hn>

Maybe you could frame this as day to day tasks and events going from a polling-based system to more of an event-driven system? I have no idea how good these products are today but I would love to use a local version running of this at some point.

If you think about it, a lot of things require initative by a human (I need to call my doctor to make an appointment; I need to check the railway service app to see if my train has any delays; I need to look at the weather report and remember to grab an umbrella). The value that these assistants offer is to remove the need for action from the human (Duet made an appointment with my doctor and put it into my calendar; Duet warned me about the delay before I actually got to the train station; Duet warns me about rain before I even leave the house).

Kinda like how rich people have an assistant that does a bunch of stuff for them. I guess in the end this is mostly about freeing headspace.

Of course, as developers we are able to build this for a while now, but most people are not.

▲▼ consumer45111:35 hn>

I have been dreading this day. A lot of us are still employed because so much of the magic has only been available to Claude Code and Desktop user. Now, every "normie" is going to start getting these boosts, cutting us out of the picture.

▲▼ gxenos9511:42 hn>

I doubt this will happen anytime soon. 90% of people are still using the free versions of ChatGPT (or maybe Claude) for the most basic tasks.

This reminds me of a post by karpathy: https://x.com/karpathy/status/2109361546505966046

▲▼ consumer45114:58 hn>

Sure, but I am talking about capable employees at decent orgs, not the general public. As in, people who already use a paid Claude.ai account at work.

▲▼ morningsam11:47 hn>

So is this the new Anthropic "model" that was supposed to be able to read users' minds, about which there were all sorts of rumors [1] this week? And whoever leaked it misunderstood that it wasn't a new model at all, just a new product using Opus 5.5?

[1]: https://www.theinformation.com/newsletters/ai-agenda/anthrop...

▲▼ vinaygundeti1812:11 hn>

Interesting to see how AI collaboration tools are evolving! The real value will be how well they fit into existing workflows and help people get things done faster, not just generate more output. Curious to see how Claude Duet develops.

▲▼ wren699112:42 hn>

Fun fact: OpenAI Dot and Claude Duet are both canonically pronounced "doot"

▲▼ x18746312:45 hn>

I appreciate how Anthropic keeps the Pro tier priced around OpenAI's Plus tier. The extra tier with OpenAI invites additional product subscription gates. Functionally, Anthropic will have a frontier model driving a personal agent available a 1/5 the cost of OpenAI. Astra may be a bigger model, but is there a meaningful qualitative difference between a personal agent running Opus 5.5 vs GPT6 Astra?

▲▼ loaderchips13:12 hn>

This will be pointless unless the overzealous guardrails are fixed

▲▼ willchis13:30 hn>

"I asked the county for Nov 6 or 7" hahaha good luck Claude, make sure you follow up with the county official every other day for the next 8 months.

▲▼ maverick-brat13:48 hn>

Funny I think I am spoiled but yeah looking at the UX since the PR's are going in crazy no wonder

▲▼ mirmor2314:55 hn>
>"Claude Duet is a proactive agent that understands what needs your attention. It takes on tasks of all sizes, keeps working while you’re away, and waits for your ok when it matters."

More hyperbole from a company angling for IPO gold. It would serve all existing customers well if they had a decent customer service, and a 'frontier model' that could respond to queries with evidence by default, instead of just making stuff up unless user is on guard all the time. Carrying the stated premise for more than an hour would be a nice touch too.

▲▼ free_lunch15:25 hn>

What on earth is going on with the 'music' on the demo video, makes me dizzy listening to it https://youtu.be/Fb-68zqcSVs

▲▼ trial315:50 hn>

sure seems like we were the first humans to listen to it

▲▼ stemonteduro15:58 hn>

I don't know how to judge the choice of an icon without a face. Honestly, grokbot's is beautiful, while the ones for dots are, let's say, a kind of reinterpretation. To me, a personal agent has to have a "face"

▲▼ trjordan16:51 hn>

I've tried the 3 labs versions of this:

- OpenAI: it’s 9pm you promised this person this note by EOD. Here’s what it should say. You want to draft it or me? (Wow yes I missed that, thank you)

- Claude: hey you logged into Docusign, is that ok?

- Grok: I tried to run a slack search and accidentally sent 3 messages to #general. Just like yesterday.

▲▼ ccorcos18:49 hn>

I really with these bots would be more portable. I'm fine with paying for a close source option, but if I'm going to make this such a critically important part of my life, then I need to know that I'm not locked in to an opaque system.