Hacker Dudes// alternate deck. same feed.
FEED ~14/h Δ0 ────:──── LINK ░ SIGNAL
97%
SPOOLED 0/45 CYCLE 61339.991.171.17
Fuck Nuance (2015)crookedtimber.org
31pts/6 comments/1d/─
by bariumbitmap / hn> / « feed
▲▼ gnabgib18:02 hn>

Discussion close the time (129 points, 68 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11370189

▲▼ qurren18:29 hn>

I like to think of nuances as nuisances. Sometimes I wonder if we can just merge these two words because they're pretty much the same thing most of the time.

▲▼ spenrose19:59 hn>

I still miss the original abstract:

- Seriously, fuck it.

▲▼ ConradKilroy20:09 hn>

thank you for posting this!

▲▼ acheron22:08 hn>

You’d better look out, because I’m gonna say “fuck”.

https://genius.com/Ben-folds-rockin-the-suburbs-lyrics

▲▼ bariumbitmap01:59 hn>

I don't know much about sociology, so I found it interesting to read a sociologist critique his own field. This part stood out to me:

>To make a loose statistical analogy, it is a little like continuing to add variables to a regression on the grounds that the explained variance keeps increasing.

Like a statistical model having parameters, a theory should have some nuance, but too much nuance is analogous to overfitting. It reminds me of the maxim that a theory should be as simple as possible but no simpler